It seems like the phrase “bandwidth caps” is quickly becoming synonymous with internet service providers here in the United States. Once a term that we celebrated and often times saw as the buzz word for whether or not we bought a company’s services, “unlimited” is quickly being phased out in favor of limitation. While a good amount of users won’t be affected by the caps, there is a much larger impact than on the personal level alone.
I’m currently an AT&T DSL user and have been fairly happy with the service. I recently upgraded from 3 to 6MB (6 wasn’t available for a while) and have seen a big difference in my download speeds. My friends and acquaintances know that I am by no means your average internet user. I’m constantly streaming, downloading or connected in one way or another. Whether it’s on Xbox LIVE, MLB TV or via wifi on my HTC G2, I’m connected. Metered internet service raises a red flag for me on multiple levels. If I were to begin with the personal level, I would say that it will indeed hinder my internet use considerably. I’ll have to throttle back my downloads and reconsider my streaming services. I’ve almost reached 150GB of transfer for a month that hasn’t even ended yet. What these large corporations don’t realize is that it has an adverse effect on the internet as a whole.
An aspect that I think most people overlook, myself included (until I read CrackerJoe’s Reddit post on the matter), is that web developers and programmers now have to re-think data delivery strategies for their web applications and media formats. If Hulu and Netflix want to stay afloat they’ll need to entertain the idea of having to optimize their data even further, or even redesign their websites to be more lightweight; in an effort to offset the load. Streaming websites such as Netflix, Hulu and Grooveshark transfer large amounts of data on a daily basis and have become hugely popular. It’s quickly becoming a slippery slope that only benefits the ISPs implementing caps. Don’t you worry though. I’m sure in the wake of negative backlash that such ludicrous limitations receive, these companies are conjuring up new names for the same old networks and services (U-Verse, LTE, 4G, 3G, etc.). A glossy new marketing campaign always does the trick, right?
A Dash of Conspiracy Theory
One would say that “conspiracy theory” is a bit of a stretch when labeling this but I’m at a loss for a better phrase. Broadband internet providers are conspiring to shut down streaming services (remember, we’re still on a theoretical level here). AT&T wouldn’t want Netflix to impose a threat on their beloved U-Verse now, would they? For those that are not familiar with U-Verse, it is a pay-TV service that AT&T provides via DSL. Essentially the same concept as Netflix and Hulu. Of course if you give into the beast that is AT&T and you have their U-Verse service, you get an extra 100GB per month of extra bandwidth (standard AT&T DSL users like myself will get a 150GB cap while U-Verse offers 250GB).
It’s obvious that caps are coming into play to protect company interests. Streaming services means more and more users are abandoning satellite and cable television, in favor of the leaner, more streamlined approach of entertainment delivery. So if companies like AT&T can hinder these providers while pushing their own streaming services, it’s a worthwhile business plan. What better way to stay alive than to eliminate the competition altogether? It’s been apparent for decades that corporations only care about one thing and that one thing is not the end user–it’s the bottom line.
Speak your mind by canceling your service in favor of one that does not impose bandwidth caps. If they see a large influx of service cancellations it’s possible they’ll change their tune. I’d love to hear the Google team’s thoughts on caps, especially with Google TV in the wild.
Update
Today I learned why nobody is interfering with AT&T’s purchase of T-Mobile. Here’s an excerpt from the site included in the Reddit post:
News reports in December 2005 first revealed that the National Security Agency (NSA) has been intercepting Americans’ phone calls and Internet communications. Those news reports, plus a USA Today story in May 2006 and the statements of several members of Congress, revealed that the NSA is also receiving wholesale copies of their telephone and other communications records. All of these surveillance activities are in violation of the privacy safeguards established by Congress and the U.S. Constitution.
Wow, I feel so much safer knowing that my once T-Mobile network will now be under surveillance by the NSA. So what are your recommendations? How’s Verizon? Sprint? There’s no way in hell I’m sticking with T-Mo…. AT&T.
Oh, I nearly forgot. To make things even better, T-Mobile 3G devices will have to be replaced over time. So basically that means the HTC G2 sitting on my desk is virtually worthless. That’s right. The phone I’ve had less than 6 months is essentially a paperweight. I can’t even sell it.
So here’s to monopolies and government surveillance. I hope you all rot.





